Zeta Global, ServiceNow, Datadog and CrowdStrike look increasingly attractive among software names as AI disrupts applications: businesses with proprietary data that build on AI and deliver intelligence and measurable outcomes could win. Cybersecurity valuations remain a concern. x.com 

Software incumbents like monday.com and CrowdStrike should hold their ground because companies will lean on existing software to integrate AI rather than rip it out. Token shortages make AI hardly usable without top-dollar spend, so firms with no business vibe-coding will use software they already pay for, which can scale to get cheaper tokens. No CEO will risk their job, and no CTO will ask the board to scrap a costly software investment. The market won't go much higher without software. x.com  … Show more

Anthropic and OpenAI's inevitable move into cybersecurity threatens CrowdStrike and Palo Alto Networks' valuations. They look like the market's biggest bubble stocks right now; CrowdStrike trades at 40x ARR despite 25% growth and negative GAAP EBIT. x.com  x.com 

AI-using software platforms such as Datadog, Snowflake, JFrog and CrowdStrike are still winning and should never have been caught in the SaaS selloff. The damage has mostly hit legacy application-software names. x.com 

The 'SaaSpocalypse' narrative is wrong because AI makes replacing enterprise software more expensive, not cheaper, leaving beaten-down SaaS stocks at once-in-a-lifetime entry levels. Replicating ServiceNow would take some 40,000 engineers to match 20 years of code, and even AI coding would raise costs, since tokens are not free and model labs lack the capacity to be enterprises' database layer. LLMs are pattern recognizers that can fail catastrophically on new problems. x.com  x.com 

CrowdStrike is not worth buying at 40x revenue, and there are very few plausible scenarios in which it is ever worth that multiple. AI is not overhyped, but the argument that massive tech disruption justifies the price echoes 2021, when Covid was said to be changing how people worked. As in 300 years of technological change, there are likely far fewer losers than expected. x.com  x.com 

CrowdStrike and Palo Alto Networks benefit from AI because it creates more security problems, so companies will need more advanced cybersecurity, not less. More than half of enterprise AI use happens outside IT oversight. Per JPMorgan, both are in good shape after Anthropic launched its Claude Mythos Preview security tool: instead of competing with them, Anthropic made them partners, which JPMorgan reads as a sign established vendors are essential to AI-driven defense, not replaceable by it. … Show more

Adobe, Salesforce and ServiceNow still generate massive cash flow, push deeper into AI and sit at the center of enterprise operations. Three of the biggest SaaS names remain beaten up in 2026; their valuations have been crushed, but the long-term opportunity may not have been. The market has swung way too far against them. x.com 

CrowdStrike's AI risk is limited but real, because it is tied to white-collar workers and their devices. A prolonged fall in white-collar employment could cut Falcon agents deployed, and an advanced AI that clearly solved big parts of cybersecurity could squeeze budgets. Against that, its core has been machine learning from day one, and AI raises security spending as attackers use it; its CEO says Charlotte usage rose over 6x. It trades at 21x EV/ARR with ARR up 24% and 0% GAAP operating margin. … Show more

Software looks like a group that can lead the market higher, with many names from Palantir and ServiceNow to Zeta and MongoDB moving from late Stage 4 or Stage 1 into early Stage 2 uptrends. Sentiment is at an all-time low on fears that AI agents and chatbots will replace SaaS. AI will disrupt some areas, but many software businesses are using it to grow revenue, ship faster and expand operating leverage, and will thrive. The charts will separate survivors from the dead. x.com  x.com