Meta's after-hours drop makes little sense, because Meta could become the default LLM for 90% of users. It has the talent, data and distribution and is spending $140B to own its AI infrastructure, while Anthropic is valued near $1 trillion. x.com
Elliot
Investment Writer, Author of Elliot’s Musings
Meta's AI infrastructure financing raises the risk that a long wait for revenue and profit will keep its shares volatile. It disclosed plans to raise up to $95 billion. @amitisinvesting warns that further dilution could keep the stock stuck even if the buildout eventually pays off. Meta's selloff is still a massive buying opportunity. x.com x.com x.com
Diversified cash flows in the billions make the AI-buildout basket more appealing than standalone model companies. Many members look reasonably priced and have longer records of delivering returns; Anthropic and OpenAI look much more like gambles at current valuations, though either could appeal at the right price. A possible equal-weight portfolio to revisit in five years includes Amazon, Alphabet, Microsoft, Meta, Oracle and SpaceX. x.com x.com
Meta looks unattractive because its fines, capital raises and AI capex make the math ugly. The stock could trade back to the $500s, while hyperscalers probably have to make those raises with equity down 15-25%. Muse looks like a fad and average users may not need AI agents, matching LogicalThesis's view. x.com x.com x.com
Fresh funding for AI expansion supports a continued bid for AI stocks as compute spending shows no sign of slowing. Meta committed to $95B in shareholder dilution for AI, Anthropic is set to have $200B in cash in a couple of weeks, and SpaceX got a $40B Apollo loan solely to buy more Nvidia GPUs. The Anthropic IPO might even be a positive catalyst rather than the negative one many fear. x.com
Meta's advertising is less vulnerable to AI agents and LLMs because users must scroll Instagram themselves. AI may even give them more time to do so, while Meta retains other mega-caps' AI tailwinds; it remains the best AI stock. CapEx is still a problem. As @diyinvestor1 noted, Meta also has no exposure to OpenAI or Anthropic. x.com x.com x.com
Meta's planned stock offerings to finance AI growth merit a selloff in its shares. The Wall Street Journal reports up to $95 billion in financing and a potential at-the-market offering of up to $60 billion, possibly beginning in Q1 2027. Send Meta to zero. x.com
Meta's early AI monetization in its core business makes the long-term upside potentially far greater than the short-term pain from its planned $95B capital raise and possible dilution. Its fair value is $1,100, and the shares are worth holding for years despite short-term moves. If Meta monetizes the infrastructure, upside is massive; even if it does not, the assets still have value. x.com
Meta's valuation is compelling again because its operating-cash-flow multiple has fallen while revenue growth accelerated over the past year. It trades at 12x operating cash flow, close to 10x 2027 operating cash flow. Its unique position should make it one of the AI era's biggest winners, with Muse becoming its best asset in the long run. The equity raise's timing was unwelcome, but that is now behind it. x.com
AI hyperscalers' heavy bond issuance can crowd out the corporate AI spending they depend on. After hyperscalers flooded the bond market all summer, a company rolling its Covid-era debt 5% higher has less left for an AI budget. And if every valuation and megatech management guide rests on commitments from Anthropic and OpenAI, they rest on unaudited financials never reported to the SEC. x.com x.com
Meta's data edge and poaching of top talent support its in-house AI development against rivals buying projects to integrate. Only Google matches its data; Anthropic and OpenAI cannot really compete without funding. Meta is taking some of Google's ad share, which should reduce Google's free cash flow. x.com