Greg
Public Equities Commentary
Meta's hundreds-of-gigawatts compute ambition looks hard to justify against the revenue a much smaller build might support. If Anthropic can generate over $70B in annualized revenue on 3GW or less, including training, hundreds of gigawatts is not a serious figure. Earlier Muse monetization than in past product cycles also makes little sense without direct integration into ad recommendations or an immediate shift in user behavior. x.com
Unclear demand for hundreds of gigawatts makes Meta's proposed compute expansion look like an expensive gamble for its stock. Reality Labs lends credence to that risk: Zuckerberg will spend through long stretches of poor ROI believing a payoff lies ahead. Muse, especially for businesses, has a vision, but the spending also looks like a contest with Elon at the stock's expense. x.com
A small advertising beat may not sustain Meta's stock after earnings if Muse cannot show durable use and paying customers to justify rising AI spending. Muse could monetize Meta's existing merchant base through subscriptions and more ad spend, but service costs and whether users keep paying remain unproven. Strong fourth-quarter guidance or firmer Muse usage and payment data would make the outlook more positive; September's rally alone does not establish a sell-the-news outcome. x.com
Meta's Muse market sizing may overstate adoption because it extrapolates from some of the most productivity-focused users on earth to consumers who enjoy browsing and may not want an assistant to replace discovery. Heavy capex, unproven technology and product-market fit, unclear ROI and an arguably weaker moat raise the risk of another metaverse-style spending mistake. x.com x.com x.com
Meta's growth and earnings make its valuation appealing. It trades at 17x 2027 estimates with 17% EPS and 22% revenue growth. Its $140 billion EBITDA should make it worth more than Anthropic, which has none, though that comparison could be wrong. If distribution is king, Meta Muse could benefit from Meta's 3.64 billion daily active users, according to GuruFocus News. x.com x.com x.com
Meta looks unattractive because its fines, capital raises and AI capex make the math ugly. The stock could trade back to the $500s, while hyperscalers probably have to make those raises with equity down 15-25%. Muse looks like a fad and average users may not need AI agents, matching LogicalThesis's view. x.com x.com x.com
More Meta third-party compute leases to support Muse could help CleanSpark convert its 885MW Texas letter of intent and exclusivity into signed leases. CleanSpark already has a 175MW, 20-year Meta lease at Sandersville. Meta raised its FY2026 capex floor to $135B, but its plans for third-party capacity and financing remain key. Muse has 10.9M downloads and ~2.5M daily users, though heavy promotion leaves their durability uncertain. x.com x.com
Meta's earnings offer little near-term upside because Muse user growth is mostly priced in and monetization remains vague. The market wants AI compute to turn into profit. Retention or paid-share commentary could help, but Zuckerberg is unlikely to provide it; SpaceX says Grokbot has 800K paid users, a high bar. Meta remains attractive long term. Higher AI capex guidance would show confidence Muse can repay the spending and be bullish for the whole AI infrastructure stack. x.com
Meta's spending to support Muse and its frontier models is likely to precede monetization, leaving the stock vulnerable to high initial 2027 expense and capex guidance. A beat-and-raise quarter is expected, but the stock could react poorly to that guidance after its recent strong performance. x.com
Meta's AI-driven ad revenue can justify sustained AI spending, arguably a bigger NVIDIA positive than its slight capex-guidance lift. Meta raised the low end of 2026 capex guidance from $130B to $135B, left the $145B ceiling unchanged and lifted the midpoint just 1.8%. Its goal of over 10x better Muse compute-cost efficiency over the next year complicates GPU-order growth even as total serving costs are expected to rise. Spending looks durable, not necessarily set for faster NVIDIA orders. x.com
Meta's 26% growth and still-unmonetized Muse make the dip buyable. ZeroHedge estimates $250 billion of AI capex next year; Meta would not spend that much unless Muse continues to unlock a massive opportunity in personal AI agents. x.com x.com
Meta's AI spending is weakening conversion of strong ad growth into profit and cash, making its valuation one to approach patiently, not chase. Revenue rose 26%, but operating profit excluding a legal settlement rose only about 11%; $34.9B in quarterly capex exceeded $32.8B in operating cash flow. AI has helped ads, though other factors contributed. One negative free-cash-flow quarter is not an operating failure, but depreciation could squeeze margins unless new revenue covers costs. x.com
