AAVE is under pressure as holders send tokens to exchanges, which usually signals selling. A $292M exploit left about $200M of bad debt, and roughly $6.6B has since left the platform. Aave is still a big DeFi project, but it is not in a good spot right now. x.com 

Aave's protocol fees do not reach token holders because Labs controls DAO governance and votes itself grants. Labs voted itself $25 million for operations and $17.5 million in performance incentives, including $5 million for launching an app. Buybacks were paused after the rsETH bridge exploit and have not resumed. Despite the protocol's quality, the Aave token is uninvestable and will keep grinding lower; unlike buyback-funded peers, holders get no direct value. x.com  x.com  x.com  x.com  x.com  … Show more

Aave's rsETH shortfall now looks filled, so what seemed a massive hole no longer is. A tracker the author quotes tallies Mantle's 30k ETH, the Arbitrum freeze's 30.7k, the Aave DAO's 25k and Stani Kulechov's 5k, plus pledges from Ether.fi, Lido and others, against a 118.4k ETH hole. The remaining goal is likely to reduce what must be borrowed from Mantle. x.com  x.com 

Aave looks slightly bearish because it lost three core operating teams in 60 days, and any crack during the transition could find AAVE more downside. Core developer BGD left April 1, governance team ACI is winding down and risk manager Chaos Labs exited April 6 after Aave offered $5M against its $8M minimum. V4 is live with LlamaRisk covering 250+ markets, and an oracle misconfiguration already liquidated about $27M of wstETH. Fundamentals and the liquidity moat remain monster-tier. x.com 

Aave's token is tanking because holders have lost faith in leadership. Wasted operating spending, a proposal to issue a new Horizon token that would divert revenue from AAVE, and a forced v4 migration alienated core advocates and users, and business partners such as Ripple are leaving. Users did not want to switch to v4, and v3's longer-term utility is in question. Aave's team replies that the Horizon proposal was removed after feedback and that dominance has risen since 2024. x.com  x.com  x.com 

Tokenized stocks are starting to generate another source of potential borrowing demand for Aave. Coinbase-issued stock token deposits on Aave V4 Base crossed $10 million, up 514% in 30 days. Eligible holders can borrow USDC without selling their stock exposure, though they face liquidation risk. x.com 

Lending tokens fall short of the sector's strong economics because team conduct and uneven holder returns undermine them. Lending capital is sticky and protocols have pricing power, but Aave rugged its DAO and Compound rugged. Morpho signaled no interest in buybacks; Kamino is silent. Maple's buybacks are small, about a tenth of revenue, and inconsistent. Spark buys back about half its revenue, but revenue is very inconsistent. The sector is great; these projects are not. x.com 

Aave is uninvestable because token holders aren't getting the protocol's value. Only about $40-50M has ever gone to token buybacks, against likely hundreds of millions or billions of AAVE inflation used to bootstrap the protocol, and the revenue wasn't used to acquire businesses or grow an Aave empire either. Despite protocol revenue of $907.7M in 2025 by one onchain tally, the token price shows the model isn't working. x.com  x.com  x.com 

AAVE looks like a DeFi blue chip at a basement price. It is the top DeFi lending protocol with more than $13 billion in total value locked and real revenue every day, yet at $76 it trades about 80% below its all-time high. x.com 

Morpho looks set to outperform Aave, with their year-to-date price performance appearing to hit an inflection point. Aave is still dealing with DAO drama and the departure of key contributors, which has overshadowed its V4 launch, and the market is pricing in that execution risk. Morpho keeps taking market share, with RWA collateral at another all-time high of $474M, per Token Terminal data. x.com