Ethereum's main problem is that it removed proof of work, and the second is that a central "they" exists that could make such a drastic change. x.comÂ
Mark Harvey
Bitcoin & Equity Investor, Engineering/Finance Background, MSTR/TSLA/SPCX
Ethereum doesn't capture the value of the stablecoins and tokens that run on it, because they create no demand for ETH; the value accrues to the tokens themselves. Tether's USDT has now passed ETH in market cap, worth more than the rails it runs on. Transaction fees alone support only a few billion dollars of market cap. x.com x.comÂ
Ether's distribution is its biggest weakness, because proof-of-stake enshrines the Cantillon effect and poorly distributed moneys always fail. Proof-of-work spreads supply through forced selling by miners, who have real costs. Ethereum's long proof-of-work history does make its distribution unusual among chains that started as proof-of-stake, and @lex_node raises fair points, but distribution would be a major reason if Ethereum fails. x.com x.comÂ
Ethereum feels weak with no clear catalyst, despite an appealing story of institutional adoption for real utility and infrastructure. The crypto craze may have petered out after about 15 years, and bitter memories of losses from counterparty blowups such as Voyager and FTX may never fade. x.comÂ
Ethereum's unstaking concern is losing steam because the validator exit queue has nearly cleared. Over 1.3 million ETH is still waiting to stake. x.comÂ
Ethereum's strong ecosystem is not translating into enough ETH value capture to support significant appreciation unless that changes. The Ethereum Foundation selling ETH again is frustrating; buybacks and stronger incentives for L2s to accumulate and buy back ETH could improve the token's economics. Fundstrat, which owns roughly 5% of the supply, has a huge opportunity to push for better value capture. x.com x.comÂ
Ethereum's real problem is the lack of new buyers. @kriptosorcerer notes weak bounces and low on-chain volume, meaning little outside investor interest to absorb selling pressure, so the decline should continue until bears get the prices they want. x.comÂ
Ethereum's offchain execution and onchain proof verification make its scaling path for the tokenization supercycle very bullish. Correcting an earlier description, high-throughput execution happens offchain, while ZK proofs and transaction-state commitments are posted onchain for verification. Vitalik proposes client-side STARK proofs and EIP-8288 aggregation to keep heavy cryptographic computation and data out of scarce block space. x.com x.comÂ
Layer-2 networks are Ethereum's competitors disguised as allies, slowly draining it in a vampire attack. They take the users, keep the fees and lobby the base layer to stay small, returning almost nothing; the small fraction of fees sent back to ETH only confuses the narrative. L2s will either migrate or become their own L1s, and either way ETH is left holding the bag. x.com x.comÂ
Ether faces a fundamental ceiling on valuation because it is not seen as money, and anything not seen as money has that cap. The ETH-as-money idea was right but badly executed; calling ETH a spam-prevention token on a distributed database was the real sin. x.com x.comÂ
ETH is undervalued because collateral and staking create demand L1 fees miss. Aave V3 has 2.2M WETH supplied and 1.75M borrowed on Ethereum. Yet Base reportedly paid Ethereum ~$15K for September data publishing versus $711K to the Optimism Collective, showing weak L1 capture. Absolute stablecoin growth matters more than share, but is not itself ETH demand. The case strengthens when activity creates sustained demand to hold, borrow against or stake ETH, or raises fee burn relative to issuance. … Show more
Ethereum's bull case is broken because adoption undermines itself. The more Ethereum is used, the higher gas fees climb, which then thwarts further adoption. x.comÂ