IREN and Nebius will need to keep aggressively raising debt and equity to grow toward CoreWeave's installed capacity, and that will eat into profit per share through interest expense or a growing share count. Their balance sheets look prettier than CoreWeave's only because their footprints are much smaller; less debt would just mean heavier dilution. @ZeekTyt counters that customer prepayments and GPU loans cover much of IREN's chip cost, keeping its debt far smaller relative to assets. x.com x.com x.comÂ