fred hickey
Editor of The High-Tech Strategist, Since 1987
US large-cap equities show epic speculation that recalls the 2000 bubble. Margin debt is up 50% year over year to $1.5T and equals 4.6% of GDP, versus 3% at the dot-com top in 2000. Comparing it with market cap misleads when market cap itself is grossly inflated, the same argument bulls made wrongly in 1999-2000. The circular AI flywheel resembles 2000's vendor financing, which ultimately led to disaster. x.com x.com x.com
Stocks' record highs rest on a bogus earnings argument, making this an irrational mania that will end very badly. Per Deutsche Bank, Micron and Nvidia drive over half of the S&P 500's projected 19% Q1 earnings growth; per Gemini, adding Broadcom, Dell and storage makers lifts that to about 68%-72%. Those suppliers book sales as earnings now while hyperscalers capitalize the capex and depreciate it for years. Excluding them leaves low-single-digit growth, too little to justify records. x.com
US large-cap equities are vulnerable because earnings have not caught up with total market capitalization. The market is farther from its 200-week moving average than at any point in 18 years, and cracks are starting to show; staying bullish ignores these risks. Rate hikes remain possible, oil is still high, and yields may climb again, so now is the time for caution. x.com x.com
US stocks are in a bubble that could end more like 1929 than 1999, given massive leveraged consumer debt and the belief that the party is only getting started. This is the most negative stance on the market since 1999. Only about 5 to 10 companies still look worth owning, mostly non-US stocks that aren't bubbly like US stocks. x.com
US large-cap equities do not look like a bubble at current forward valuations. The S&P 500 forward P/E is below both its five- and ten-year averages, while tech and momentum have suffered their worst five-month decline by far. x.com
High debt and rate hikes make a big US equity correction likely. Warsh said nothing useful despite hot CPI and PPI after two weeks of hawkish rhetoric, while the rest of the Fed fence-sits. A debt crisis is incoming, and some funds will blow up soon. Big caps are the last leg; the bigger correction could be something like 20%. It is not a good time to buy dips. x.com x.com x.com x.com x.com x.com x.com
Credit tightening and data-center delays threaten the debt-funded AI boom behind the S&P 500. Junk-bond sales fell from $51B in September to $7B in October's first three weeks; CCC yields hit a four-year high, though quality firms still borrowed. Per S&P Global, 146 data-center projects were delayed or canceled, potentially weakening buildout credit. With 40% of the index in 10 names, this is dot-com and 2008 combined; stocks have not caught up, and even good firms may be sold. x.com
US large-cap equities look near a bottom because hedge-fund positioning suggests forced selling is in its final innings, not economic deleveraging. By many measures this is one of the largest hedge-fund equity deleveraging events in 30 years; AI positions built over 18 months are being unwound in 75 days. Yet profits are growing about 20% year over year, AI compute demand exceeds supply, and the S&P 500 has barely moved. Contagion has reached credit, multistrats and European bonds. x.com
US large-cap stocks are frothy and now need years of earnings to validate today's prices, even though the rally is not irrational. Per FactSet, S&P 500 earnings are up about 28% versus 13% expected, but the Shiller P/E is near 42, close to 1999-2001 extremes. Per @KobeissiLetter, leveraged ETF assets hit a record $177B and the leading-to-coincident indicator ratio of 0.84 matches the 2008 low; per @charliebilello, 90+ day delinquencies hit 13.1% for credit cards and 5.6% for auto loans. x.com … Show more
US stocks remain vulnerable because leveraged long positions could amplify an unwind of the mania. The SPY-versus-long-Treasury trade has given back only a few weeks of its gains. x.com
Rising S&P earnings revisions and a Nasdaq valuation far below the 2000 bubble level argue against a bull trap in US large caps. Nasdaq trades at 18x forward earnings versus over 80x in 2000. Positive breadth divergences, record short ETF exposure and put volume, and semiconductors waking up add to the case. In all 19 post-midterm instances cited, markets were very green over the following 12 months. x.com x.com
The AI-led S&P 500 peak will likely end somewhere between 2000 and the Nifty Fifty: painful, but not a 34-year Japan-style wait. Breadth is ugly, with record index highs while most stocks bleed; @RestlessCentaur notes over 70% of S&P 500 stocks are down more than 10%. Today's leaders trade around 30x forward earnings, while the 2000 and Japan tops were two to three times pricier. x.com x.com x.com x.com x.com
