British American Tobacco carries cannabis optionality that few big companies admit to, and Big Tobacco will lean into cannabis hard rather than pull back. BAT describes a "foothold in the cannabis space" that is "several years away from being a meaningful contributor". @UseThouBrain, in the post being answered, backs Organigram on the view that BAT's idea of meaningful means billions, backed by patent-pending non-combustible IP; that is a different bet, far down the field, but not a bad one. x.com x.com x.com




