Pegasus
Long/Short Equity Investor
AXT is absurdly valued at $8 billion, or 31x 2030 estimates, because the market is bidding up anything labeled a bottleneck. Such companies quickly turn from bottlenecks into over-earning commodity businesses, leaving holders with a bad bag. The guide shown from the last cycle puts quarterly revenue at just $26.9 million, and management was smart to have just raised $600 million. x.com x.com x.com x.comÂ
Small caps such as AXT that have risen 8,800% in a year at forward P/Es in the hundreds look held by buyers hoping to dump on the next person. Investors should ask who runs them, what the moats are and whether competitors can replicate them; Nvidia's Jensen Huang says most bottlenecks can be solved within a few years, so what happens in 5-10? This pushes back on @aleabitoreddit's claim that AXT controls the materials buildout for photonics. x.comÂ
AXT's permit-backed Q4 outlook weakens the near-term operating objection to the Sell case. Q3 revenue reached $73.4M at 56% GAAP gross margin; management guides to about $90M in Q4 from business permitted or not needing permits. InP contributed $54.3M and backlog exceeds $500M, though much spans years. The remaining test is whether 2027 capacity becomes qualified, permitted shipments at durable margins. x.com x.com x.comÂ
AXT is a speculative add on the market's sharp drop, because indium phosphide wafer prices have reportedly risen a lot lately. x.comÂ
AXT's roughly $9B valuation can't be justified by its fundamentals. Even if revenue grows fivefold from $80M to $400M next year, EBIT would still be below $150M, which doesn't support an enterprise value of $9B or even $5B. Beyond short covering, it's hard to see anyone owning AXT at even half today's valuation, despite @aleabitoreddit's view that its indium phosphide substrates are a bottleneck whose contracts predate price hikes. x.com x.comÂ
AXT is a good company, but its valuation is currently somewhat high. x.comÂ
AXT makes the indium phosphide substrates needed for high-speed data center connectivity, making it an AI infrastructure and optical connectivity play. EPS is expected to grow from $0.86 in 2026 to $3.29 by 2028, nearly 4x in two years. The chart is building the right side of a cup base. x.comÂ
AXT looks expensive against its earnings at 28x, versus the roughly 18x chip-equipment makers usually get. At 18x next year's $2.23 EPS, give or take 12%, fair value is $35.26-$44.88, so the $61.64 price is 37% above the high end, with a PEG of 12.09 flagged as bubble territory. The view uses reported earnings and estimates only, without fundamental work. x.comÂ
AXT looks like a shell of Chinese companies at an absurd valuation: about 30x next year's sales and likely over 100x 2027 gross profit for a low-margin commodity business. Its manufacturing and most operations are in mainland China, while its US auditor has no China operations. The stock is up about 67% from last week's secondary pricing, and its only 5%+ holder has filed on just one other stock, a penny stock. x.com x.comÂ
AXT is among the high-growth companies likely to beat 5.2% bond yields: revenue rose 164% year on year and 77% sequentially, and it swung to a profit. As @BULLOFBRITAIN notes, the market is offering 100% growers at a 40% discount because investors want to lock in bond yields. x.comÂ
AXT's upside looks capped because its valuation already prices in a near-flawless indium phosphide capacity ramp. Doubling its ~25k wafers a year by end-2026 and again by end-2027 gives ~100k, about 4x, likely with some multiple compression. Even with ~58% growth to 2028, 60% gross-profit growth after and a 20x EV/GP multiple, EV reaches only ~$6.9B in five years versus $6.1B now. Only surprise capacity beyond 2027 changes the math; Soitec, at 19x EV/GP, is the better play. x.com x.comÂ
