Celestica's conservative guidance and program pipeline leave room for further revenue upside. Its 2027 outlook is $40B, 90% above the $21B 2026 outlook, which has risen four times; a beat looks possible. StockedgeN cites 60-70 new programs, and only a few need to convert to matter at Celestica's scale. Complex racks force it up the value chain. At about 15x next-twelve-month earnings, the stock looks cheap, though a dip may be a better entry. Organic growth takes priority over buybacks. x.com  … Show more

Vertiv's growth and cash flow make its valuation the better risk/reward than Bloom Energy at these prices. It is the one I'd buy first for a long-term hold: 23x next year's earnings with 37% EPS growth, nearly $3B in free cash flow and almost no net debt. Adjusted operating profit of $1.087B topped the $938M guidance ceiling; revenue and EPS also beat estimates. x.com 

Vertiv is a great company, supplying the power and cooling AI data centers need as rack densities climb past 100kW, with its cooling systems a major draw. Its liquid-cooling, power, heat-rejection and prefabricated modular systems bring more of the data-center stack under one roof, which could become a meaningful competitive advantage. Grid power and thermal capacity, not silicon supply, are now the limiting factor in AI. x.com  x.com 

Vertiv's surging orders and Q3 growth show AI infrastructure demand exceeding expectations. Per WallStEngine, revenue rose 61% to $4.3B, adjusted EPS rose 78% to $2.21, organic orders grew more than 100%, and FY26 guidance was raised above estimates. Vertiv is delivering into accelerating demand for its power and cooling equipment. x.com  x.com 

Celestica looks unusually inexpensive relative to its growth. Its enterprise value is 0.99 times next-twelve-month revenue against 58.7% revenue growth, yielding a 0.0168 growth-adjusted revenue multiple; few companies compare better. Its 14.7 times forward earnings against 69.8% earnings growth gives a 0.21 PEG, below the conventional 1.0 fair-value heuristic. x.com  x.com  x.com 

Celestica's run-up prices in pricing power it does not have. It is a service-centric, labor-intensive business with very thin gross and operating margins, which limits how much operating leverage it can deliver. Its share sale looks like a way to take advantage of FOMO and place the funding burden on equity investors rather than the balance sheet. x.com  x.com  x.com 

Celestica's cheap TPU exposure offers upside, but its low margins and smaller moat than Vicor's make it a trade rather than a large core holding. It will probably reach $400-$500 over time; $400 next year looks likely. An attached analyst note expects scrutiny of a cut in 2026 free-cash-flow guidance from $600M to $460M due mainly to working capital; it warns that 2027 free cash flow could turn negative if working-capital investment stays high alongside $1.5B-$2B of capex. x.com  x.com  x.com 

Vertiv is a great company that should be a long-term winner even if it struggles short term. In the near term there is cautious optimism that it holds its new floor in the $250s. Its market cap is too high for personal buying right now, though. x.com 

Vertiv is investable only on pullbacks because its valuation is borderline rich. Fundamentals are elite: Q2 sales rose 24.1% to $3.27 billion, adjusted operating margin reached 22.6%, it has net cash and a $15 billion backlog. But GuruFocus puts fair value at $157.57 versus a $223.58 price, and the P/E of about 65x is well above the industry's 37x. Red flags include fraud investigations after the post-earnings drop, reliance on hyperscaler capex and project-timing risk. x.com 

Vertiv's broad earnings beats strengthen the case that it can scale profitably despite execution risk. Revenue grew 61.2% year over year versus 40.1% expected, and operating margin reached 25.2% versus 24.6% expected. Full-year guidance of $14.65B in revenue and $7.15 in EPS exceeds estimates of $14.008B and $6.73. x.com