Microsoft's delivery delays are affecting earnings, making other sources of returns look safer now. x.com 

Microsoft is cheap but not a long-term holding, because it is not growing fast enough while Nvidia is cheaper, growing much faster and better positioned. Microsoft may be re-rating, but the backdrop could also push it to a 15x P/E, so for now it is only a tradable situation. x.com 

Microsoft's 50% Azure growth and prospect of positive cash flow in 2027 make the stock look bulletproof. Headcount cuts, lower Anthropic spend, a better Copilot routed to cheaper tokens, and coming proprietary chips and model usage add to the case. It should get Apple's multiple plus recognition for cybersecurity. x.com  x.com 

Microsoft faces AI disruption that could erode its software moat and compress its high multiple. Chris Hohn, the best stock picker ever and not one to move lightly, cut Microsoft from 10% to 1% of his portfolio, about $8 billion, citing AI disruption. The question that matters is whether a business can be disrupted: when code becomes a commodity the moat erodes, and multiple compression from a high base does severe damage. x.com 

Microsoft is losing ground in fast AI innovation and is not cheap enough to compensate. Copilot was strong a few months ago but is no longer competitive in an agent-driven world, and the stock closed below its 200-week moving average for the first time since 2013. At about 21x forward EPS for 22% growth it is solid but not cheap, and compared with Nvidia there is little argument for allocating even 1% of a portfolio to Microsoft. x.com 

Microsoft's salesforce and governed platform unlock AI spending at conservative firms. Faster enterprise than consumer AI adoption makes it effectively the only pure play. M365 Commercial may top 20% growth next quarter, sooner than expected on tonight's guide; GitHub resegmentation helps, but it should do so this year anyway. Azure and M365, two-thirds of revenue, should grow above 50% and 20% and may accelerate. $24-25 CY27 EPS remains achievable, implying under 22x forward earnings. x.com  … Show more

Microsoft is expensive on cash flow even though its 19-22x forward P/E looks like a 40% discount to its 10-year average. Its 2.0% forward free-cash-flow yield sits below the 3.3% 10-year median, and at this point in the cycle earnings multiples mislead while free cash flow is what the market actually prices. x.com 

Microsoft is a great business but still an expensive bet at $385, because heavy AI capex is eroding free cash flow. Capex was revised to $190B for the year, $43B above expectations, and free cash flow fell to $15.8B. Revenue grew 18% to $82.9B, operating income 20%, Azure 40% and AI run rate reached $37B, with a 47% operating margin. The average analyst target of $560 implies 45% upside only if the AI spending converts on schedule. x.com 

Microsoft's valuation is starting to look attractive at about 22x forward earnings, a 4.5% earnings yield, for a pristine, wide-moat compounder with secular tailwinds. It remains a cash machine, funding heavy AI and infrastructure spending from its own operations while still generating plenty of free cash flow, without borrowing or issuing stock, even with shares down double digits this year. x.com 

Microsoft and software stocks broadly still look expensive, because AI will get exponentially better over the next two years and the market may reset software valuations much lower. Software valuations have always been ludicrous, and heavy stock-based compensation behind many software revenues is widely ignored. Winners will emerge, but picking them is not worth trying. x.com  x.com