Credo's results were underwhelming for a company that added $32 billion in market value in a few months, and shorts may punish the stock. Per @WisemanCap, fiscal Q4 EPS of $1.16 beat the $1.02 estimate and revenue of $437 million was just above estimates, while Q1 fiscal 2027 revenue guidance of $465-476 million was roughly in line with the $464.7 million consensus. x.com  x.com 

Credo was overpriced even with great earnings, and it is still a little pricey at $190. Per @wallstengine, revenue rose 114.7% to $479.0M, beating estimates, and Q2 guidance of $525M-$535M also topped expectations, yet the stock is down $112 from its high of a few months ago. Valuation matters, and $150-$170 would be a decent entry point. x.com 

Credo's repeatedly conservative guidance and quarterly beats suggest analysts understate next year's EBIT. It trades at 15x their estimate, but likely 12-13x next year's EBIT if management's guidance holds. Management has executed as well as almost any company in recent years, and the multiple could easily end up closer to 10x than 15x. x.com 

Credo's upside looks capped as growth falls short of earlier expectations and large stock-based compensation, hidden behind GAAP financials, looks excessive. BofA cut its target to $275 from $340 and Evercore to $292 from $325 on deceleration worries, the 1.6T DSP is delayed, and operating cash flow fell to $90M. The stock is 43% off its high; at $164 it trades at 30-33x FY27 earnings and 13x forward sales, more reasonable but still not worth owning. x.com  x.com  x.com  x.com 

Credo's 11% drop on its promotion to the Russell 1000 was index plumbing, but falling twice as much as chips exposed its fragility: at 33x sales with three customers making up 88% of revenue, it is vulnerable. Forced Russell 2000 selling met only a teaspoon of large-cap index buying. Holding $236 and reclaiming $241 targets a $252 gap fill; losing $231 means real sellers. The next print, around early September, decides it: falling concentration makes it a trade, 88% staying means fade the rip. … Show more

Credo's near-total share of AI data-center cables and unchanged estimates make its lower multiple look like a fear-driven opportunity. Its stock went from 27x to 20x forward earnings while the supply chain building those systems guided 2027 revenue to double. Buyers this week will probably be very happy a year from now. x.com 

Marvell looks attractive even on current guidance, which keeps rising as AI infrastructure demand may be outpacing long-term models. Its fiscal 2028 revenue target has climbed from $13 billion in September 2025 to $18 billion now, up 38% in under a year. With fiscal 2027 guided at $12 billion, the next six quarters imply $24.84 billion of revenue and, at a 31.6% non-GAAP net margin, $7.85 billion of earnings, so at $216.62 the stock trades at about 24 times that. x.com  x.com 

Broadcom is at least 30-40% undervalued, trading at about a market multiple of 22x forward earnings despite many growth drivers. FY2026 Q3 revenue rose 86%, operating income 92% and EPS 96% year over year even with supply constraints, though Q4 guidance was a little light. Per @saso_capital, Hock Tan said data-center readiness, not supply, is the constraint, across six XPU customers including Anthropic, OpenAI, Meta and Google. The stock is bouncing off a big volume shelf from April 2025. x.com  … Show more

Credo was an easy buy because its share price was ridiculously low against estimated revenues, as a quick look at its last quarterly report showed despite the hate. @KawzInvests adds that the DustPhotonics deal removes the bear case that a shift to optical breaks Credo, giving it a silicon photonics portfolio from 400G to 1.6T with a 3.2T roadmap. x.com 

Credo looks cheap against its earnings at about 17.5x next year's EPS, versus the roughly 38x chipmakers usually get. At 38x the $9.63 forecast EPS, give or take 12%, fair value is about $322-410, leaving the stock near $168 about 48% below the low end. The view leans heavily on forecasts, as forward EPS is 284% above trailing, and it is a valuation-levels read rather than fundamental work. x.com