GrowthTurtle
Data Science PhD & IEEE Fellow, Ex-Two Sigma
TotalEnergies looks cheap against its earnings at 11x trailing and 8x next year's, while oil and gas producers usually get 14x. Applying 14x to mid-cycle EPS of $8.01 gives a fair range of $98.74 to $125.67 versus $90.94 now. Trailing and forward earnings differ by 34%, widening the range. This is a valuation read only, not fundamental work. x.comÂ
EOG Resources is deeply undervalued on EV/EBITDA, a big discount given where oil prices are now, and the chart looks strong. x.comÂ
Occidental Petroleum is mispriced at about 8.4x trailing earnings and an 8.7% free cash flow yield during an oil shock. Eight times earnings in an oil shock is not a valuation but a clerical error with a ticker symbol. Iran cannot beat the US Navy, so it is waiting out America's vote in 49 days, since Iran does not vote until 2028; owning Occidental beats hiding in Treasuries. x.comÂ
US energy stocks are being steadily accumulated after a 17-year base, and that base will not resolve in a month. The sector broke out this year and pulled back on contracting volume, which is digestion, not distribution. Energy trades near 13x earnings versus about 20x for hyperscalers. Stocks now rise with oil and get bought back when oil falls. Tech is priced for the cost of capital to come down; energy for the reason it will not. x.com x.com x.comÂ
PrimeEnergy trades around 6x normalized earnings because its reserve life is a huge unknown: about five years of proven reserves plus three more years of identified drilling, with little visibility beyond. It will probably outperform that long term, but near term it is mostly oil beta, with intermittent, unpredictable alpha. Better gas pricing once more takeaway capacity is online would help, since it gets only $0.75 for natural gas, and liquids output nearing 2 million barrels de-risks opex. … Show more
Vista Energy grows over 20% yet trades at about 10x earnings, while most big oil companies trade at 20-25x with single-digit growth. It also works as an oil hedge. x.com x.comÂ
Kosmos Energy probably deserves to trade higher because its gas production is priced as a percentage of Brent and growing, a substantial tailwind that leaves it highly geared to the oil strip. With its development program, effective oil reserve life is probably closer to 10 years than 7. Fair value works out to around $4 a share, with a wide range of outcomes. The risk is $2.5 billion of debt at an E&P with declining production and 18 months of lean capex. x.com x.com x.com x.com x.comÂ
Oil majors such as Shell, BP, ExxonMobil and Chevron deserve their multiples because they have consistently generated 10%+ returns across complete energy cycles. They are integrated, now diversified, and control a key commodity for decades ahead. Investors will do fine if they hold for the long term. x.comÂ
US energy stocks are too cheap to ignore while investors pay up for richly valued growth names. The sector trades at 6 to 8 times earnings with massive free cash flow, yet makes up only 3.5% of the S&P 500. SpaceX and Tesla combined are worth more than the entire energy sector, with the crowd paying 90 times revenue for a rocket company. x.comÂ
US energy stocks are mispriced by extrapolation bias, priced for a world that has already changed. In Q1 2026, tech and communication services posted 50%+ earnings growth while energy printed -4%, the only sector FactSet flagged for a downward revision. Ex those two sectors, S&P 500 growth was 9.3%. The 10 largest energy stocks carry a 36-month beta of 0.0003 and an 8% free-cash-flow yield on trailing $65 oil. x.comÂ
