Snap looks very interesting as a long-term buy at a forward P/E of 6 and a PEG of 0.21. Growth is expected near 10% for the next two years, with positive earnings expected from next year. x.com
Gublo
Small/Mid-Cap Trader, Multibagger/Penny Stocks, Earnings Analysis & Signals
Snap's Spectacles cannot deliver meaningful commercial value within five years, making a funding partner essential to avoid years of cash burn. At best, they are a prototype, with zero chance of profitability in the next couple of years; the glasses will never sell at the scale needed to make a difference. Without a partner, Snap stock is dead money. Even so, Snap remains a good asymmetric bet on Evan Spiegel changing course, with little downside from here if he does not. x.com x.com x.com x.com
Snap is slowly turning into a subscription software company, with Snapchat+ revenue up 87% in Q1 to $285 million, nearly 19% of total revenue versus 11% a year ago and now a $1 billion annual run rate. The price target is $14. x.com x.com
Snap has been treated like an ATM by CEO Evan Spiegel, with no operating income a decade after going public. Its Specs glasses are unlikely to sell at meaningful scale for $2,200 each, and Snap badly needs executives capable of saying no to clearly horrible ideas. x.com x.com x.com
Snap's core business is priced like a cyclical commodity company, with its Specs AR glasses thrown in nearly free. Revenue grew from $4.6 billion in 2023 to $5.9 billion in 2025 and free cash flow from $35 million to $437 million, and management aims to keep the diluted share count stable from 2027. Valuing Specs at about $1 billion leaves core Snap at roughly 7.3x trailing and 5.1x 2027 EV/EBITDA. Better-than-feared Specs teasers and Meta's AR push make the setup asymmetric. x.com
Snap deserves more than the 6x 2027 EBITDA multiple Wells Fargo still assigns it. Wells Fargo raised its 2027 EBITDA estimate by 11% to $1.78 billion, partly on stronger Snap+ revenue, but kept that valuation multiple unchanged. x.com
Snap is not a buy despite bullish takes after CEO Evan Spiegel's annual letter, given zero CEO buys in years, out-of-control stock comp and weak margins. Its FCF margin is 7.4% and net margin 14%, versus Reddit's 33% and 45%. If Snap reached about $9.2B of 2030 revenue at roughly 30% net margins, $1.55 EPS at about 26x would mean a $40 stock versus $5.50 today, but a lot needs to go right. x.com
Snap as a whole trades around a $10 billion valuation, half the $20 billion floated for a stake in its Specs AR unit, so buying the entire company effectively gets the ad business for free. x.com
AppLovin looks like a sweet deal after falling about 53-55% this year despite exceptional fundamentals. It has 88% gross margins and 64-65% net margins, consensus sees $10.5B of 2027 revenue, and it trades at about 20x forward earnings with a PEG near 0.5-0.6. Why it is down so much is unclear; the SaaS narrative may be weighing on it. x.com x.com x.com
Snap's stock-based compensation is the main problem, and its CEO is a further negative. x.com
Snap is in a bad position when Pinterest is now the better business of the two. x.com