Enthusiasm for Meta looks overdone now, because its Muse AI is likely to be cut off from many of its functions, as Amazon has just done, and competitors will emerge. The stock was a good buy in the $500s. x.com
Late Stage Capitalism
Physician, Long-Term Stock Investor with 30 Years of Experience
Meta looks unattractive because its fines, capital raises and AI capex make the math ugly. The stock could trade back to the $500s, while hyperscalers probably have to make those raises with equity down 15-25%. Muse looks like a fad and average users may not need AI agents, matching LogicalThesis's view. x.com x.com x.com
Meta's spending to support Muse and its frontier models is likely to precede monetization, leaving the stock vulnerable to high initial 2027 expense and capex guidance. A beat-and-raise quarter is expected, but the stock could react poorly to that guidance after its recent strong performance. x.com
Muse gives Meta a way to monetize its massive installed base. Meta is now ready to pursue that opportunity. x.com
Amazon could dip as Meta integrates a variety of merchants with its Muse agent, one of the takeaways from Meta's product event. The stock's reaction is the thing to watch. x.com
Meta's hundreds of billions in AI investment have produced Muse, a free, largely undifferentiated personal assistant app that will likely never generate economics. Muse topped app-store downloads and helped fuel a two-day gamma squeeze mostly because it is new and free. Amazon has already cut it off from shopping its site, and once the novelty fades it will probably see little use given its limited utility; people actually like doing their own shopping. x.com
Meta and Muse remain bullish, but Amazon cutting off Muse shows a digital knife fight is coming that many are overlooking, since no platform wants to be commoditized or layered over. Meta's heavy spending on talent and infrastructure leaves it well equipped for that fight. x.com x.com
Meta's Muse market sizing may overstate adoption because it extrapolates from some of the most productivity-focused users on earth to consumers who enjoy browsing and may not want an assistant to replace discovery. Heavy capex, unproven technology and product-market fit, unclear ROI and an arguably weaker moat raise the risk of another metaverse-style spending mistake. x.com x.com x.com
A small advertising beat may not sustain Meta's stock after earnings if Muse cannot show durable use and paying customers to justify rising AI spending. Muse could monetize Meta's existing merchant base through subscriptions and more ad spend, but service costs and whether users keep paying remain unproven. Strong fourth-quarter guidance or firmer Muse usage and payment data would make the outlook more positive; September's rally alone does not establish a sell-the-news outcome. x.com
Meta's Muse could bring in more cash flow than any product it has launched before, making shares in the $600s a sweet bet. Muse should create immense margin expansion, synergies, new revenue streams and services. Scaling capex is shrinking net income even as revenue keeps growing. x.com
Meta's hundreds-of-gigawatts compute ambition looks hard to justify against the revenue a much smaller build might support. If Anthropic can generate over $70B in annualized revenue on 3GW or less, including training, hundreds of gigawatts is not a serious figure. Earlier Muse monetization than in past product cycles also makes little sense without direct integration into ad recommendations or an immediate shift in user behavior. x.com