Tesla's Cybercab may command a premium because it offers a much better ride. It seems to earn over $3 per mile, making Tesla a cash generator for now, though that pricing may not last. Q4 robotaxi miles already appear above Q3 with less than a third of the quarter elapsed; paid miles are tracking for over 3x quarterly growth. Grok roughly estimates Tesla's robotaxi annual revenue run rate at $100-150M versus Waymo's $390-500M; Tesla is on pace to overtake Waymo within months. x.com  x.com  x.com  … Show more

Tesla's Cybercab network could eventually become largely self-running because Optimus may build and service cars while the cars drive and charge themselves. Texas registrations now show 544 Cybercabs versus 507 Model Ys; Tesla added 737 robotaxis since September 1 versus Waymo's 471. Cybercab is designed for wireless charging, though people still clean the cars. Musk says Optimus and Cybercab will account for most of Tesla's value. x.com  x.com 

Tesla's robotaxi business will add little to 2027 revenue: even a near-miraculous fleet of 50,000 by end-2027 would bring only about $1 billion. Politicians will work to slow robotaxi adoption even after safety is undeniable, and each robotaxi needs a city license. Net margins of 80-85% are unrealistic given electricity, wear and tear, cleaning and infrastructure costs; about 50% gross margin and a 25% contribution to net profit is the best case. x.com  x.com  x.com  x.com 

Scaling Tesla's robotaxi fleet to 5,000 could yield a $584 million annual revenue run rate by year-end. The model assumes 24/7 operation, 40 daily rides per vehicle averaging five miles, 70% utilization, and current fares of $3 plus $1 per mile. A 5,000-vehicle fleet by year-end is now the expectation; introducing Cybercabs in other states could keep growth going at its current pace. x.com  x.com  x.com 

Tesla's accelerating Cybercab registrations make a commercially significant fleet more plausible, which the market is starting to notice. The tracker shows 544 registered in Texas and 229 spotted on roads; an earlier snapshot counted 114 new registrations in a week and the first Dallas sighting. At that earlier pace, registrations could exceed 1,500 by year-end, or reach 2,000 if growth steepens; at 2,000, the model points toward robotaxi roughly doubling Tesla's earnings. x.com  x.com 

Tesla isn't a buy yet because the stock, at over 300x trailing earnings, already prices in Robotaxi success that Cybercab hasn't proven at scale. Cybercab began rides in Austin, but about 45 of roughly 420 Tesla autonomous vehicles in Texas only show the cars can run. Order volumes, intervention and accident rates and per-car profit are undisclosed, NHTSA is still reviewing safety, and Q2 operating margin was 1.4% with -$1.1B free cash flow. Approval, fleet growth and unit economics are key. … Show more

Tesla's robotaxi fleet should grow exponentially soon because the first 1,000 vehicles were the hardest and slowest to add. Texas DMV now shows 1,051 registered Tesla robotaxis: 544 Cybercabs, up from 463 on October 25, and 507 Model Ys. Cybercabs outnumber Model Ys for the first time; autonomous miles have surpassed Waymo's in Austin. The next fleet doublings to 2,000, 4,000 and beyond should each take less time. The 690-Cybercab Thanksgiving line is a target, not a forecast. x.com  x.com  x.com 

Tesla's growing Texas robotaxi roster could mean more vehicles deployed soon. Its 970 DMV registrations, including 463 Cybercabs, have significantly narrowed the gap with Waymo's 1,207. Registration does not mean those vehicles are operating in the field yet. x.com 

Tesla's robotaxi opportunity is smaller near term than the market priced in because the roughly $60B US ride-hailing market cannot justify the hype. 380,000 unsupervised Q2 miles prove the technology works, but a $300B+ market requires Americans to give up car ownership. Uber and Lyft cost about $2.40 a mile and Tesla's robotaxi about $2.00, versus under $0.80 for a private car. Maintenance, insurance, charging and cleaning eat about 37% of fares, so cutting prices would destroy unit economics. … Show more

Tesla's Cybercab could pay back faster than Waymo's vehicles because its estimated build cost is seven times lower. At 100 miles a day and $3 a mile, a $25,000 Cybercab at $0.25 per mile in operating costs would net about $100,000 a year at a 92% margin, paying back in about three months. A $175,000 Waymo vehicle at $0.60 per mile would net about $88,000 at an 80% margin, paying back in about two years. Lower fares would lengthen both paybacks, but Cybercab keeps its capital advantage. x.com