Finance Jack
Equity Research
FICO's deteriorating competitive position makes it too hard to own for now, even though 18x 2027 earnings looks tempting given its growth. Management went too far with pricing power, which put the company in a tighter spot, and loaded the balance sheet with debt for buybacks. FICO is unlikely to command the premium multiple it has in the past. x.comÂ
FICO no longer merits ownership because its business model, once arguably the best in the world, has made too many enemies and may have gotten too greedy with pricing. x.comÂ
Fair Isaac looks more reasonable after a price reset but is now a slower compounder, still not a buy. FHFA has opened the door to VantageScore, which will chip away some share and end easy 10-15% annual price hikes, cutting earnings growth to the mid-teens from the twenties. The main concern remains management funding buybacks with debt at record multiples, reducing flexibility. If it slows the leverage, shareholders could still do fine, though more grinding than explosive. x.comÂ
Fair Isaac's selloff looks technically overdone and will probably push the company to double down on buybacks, making it a short-term bounce trade. The longer-term case is less compelling. x.com x.com x.comÂ
FICO's moat is starting to get disrupted, and the premium multiple holders once defended has not held up. Two years ago the stock traded at 80x EPS on the argument that a high-quality compounder with a moat deserved it; that multiple has since compressed by about 80%. FICO would need to rise 280% to regain its all-time high, and there is a good chance it never does. x.com x.com x.comÂ
Fair Isaac still looks far too expensive at 90x free cash flow, even after a 75% fall in a monopoly. Even if FCF doubled, the price would equal 45 years of cash flow, and doubling at FICO's size is much less plausible after it raised prices 17 times and angered customers. The test is whether the company can earn the price paid within an investor's lifetime under generous growth assumptions. x.com x.com x.com x.comÂ
FICO is trading at its lowest valuation of the decade, about 13x forward earnings for what is essentially a duopoly, which is attractive. @thejmkane counters that it is no longer really a monopoly, but a duopoly at 13x is not so bad. x.com x.comÂ
FICO now offers a negatively skewed payoff, with bounded upside and open-ended downside, despite exceptional business economics. Debt-funded buybacks in Q2'26 added fragility, and mortgage scores increasingly dominate operating income amid rising competition and possible adverse regulation of GSE-mandated scores. Unscathed, it could re-rate toward its prior multiple, arguably lower; if VantageScore gains traction, new pricing fails or regulators impair pricing power, it could fall significantly. … Show more
Fair Isaac is losing its monopoly status after this morning's announcement, and sector dominance and moat matter more than fundamentals that look sound on paper. x.comÂ
Fair Isaac looks insanely cheap at its lowest P/E in well over a decade, with fundamentals that still look beautiful. Per @stock_analysisx, the derating follows the US government's move to end FICO's mortgage scoring monopoly, leaving the stock at its lowest P/E since 2013. x.com x.comÂ
Fair Isaac at 40x GAAP earnings and 30x EBITDA is no value stock. Much of the gap between GAAP and adjusted earnings is stock-based compensation, $160 million over the past 12 months against net income of $658 million last year, a chunky share of profits even though buybacks exceed issuance. If FICO counts as consensus value, it is time to retire the idea of value investing. x.com x.com x.com x.comÂ