Snap's smart glasses will likely only hurt its core business. Unlike Meta, Snap cannot afford to invest billions in bets that may never pay off, and Meta should end up with a near-monopoly on smart glasses. x.com
Daniel
Self-Directed Investor, YouTube Investing Creator
Meta's VR glasses have just killed Snap's Spectacles, leaving anyone long Snap on the wrong side. x.com
Snap is an easy pass: its new Specs AR glasses look goofy, the shiny reflective coating makes them worse, and management doesn't care because it was already paid through stock compensation and salary for creating the product. x.com
Snap's Spectacles cannot deliver meaningful commercial value within five years, making a funding partner essential to avoid years of cash burn. At best, they are a prototype, with zero chance of profitability in the next couple of years; the glasses will never sell at the scale needed to make a difference. Without a partner, Snap stock is dead money. Even so, Snap remains a good asymmetric bet on Evan Spiegel changing course, with little downside from here if he does not. x.com x.com x.com x.com
Meta and Apple are in a long-term race to build practical VR glasses that could break the iPhone's two-decade stranglehold in the 2030s. Meta started light and comfortable but must add orders of magnitude more power; Apple started with the powerful but bulky Vision Pro, essentially a prototype, and must shrink it. They may meet in the middle in the early 2030s. Meta's new glasses are a big leap forward, but this is still the first inning, and owning both makes sense. x.com x.com x.com
Snap is uninvestable because nobody is going to wear its new smart glasses. A quoted post notes the stock has fallen for five straight years and the company is now trying to sell $2,500 goggles. x.com x.com
Snap's core business is priced like a cyclical commodity company, with its Specs AR glasses thrown in nearly free. Revenue grew from $4.6 billion in 2023 to $5.9 billion in 2025 and free cash flow from $35 million to $437 million, and management aims to keep the diluted share count stable from 2027. Valuing Specs at about $1 billion leaves core Snap at roughly 7.3x trailing and 5.1x 2027 EV/EBITDA. Better-than-feared Specs teasers and Meta's AR push make the setup asymmetric. x.com
Social media bans for young users, now introduced in the UK after Australia, should hurt Snap far more than Meta. Apps in general are unappealing investments. x.com
Snap has been treated like an ATM by CEO Evan Spiegel, with no operating income a decade after going public. Its Specs glasses are unlikely to sell at meaningful scale for $2,200 each, and Snap badly needs executives capable of saying no to clearly horrible ideas. x.com x.com x.com
Snap's Specs and AI platform are drawing heavyweight partners: Nvidia, Salesforce and Amazon teamed up with Snap for Snap Intelligence and Enterprise. Gen 1 Specs suit early business adoption, but consumer adoption hinges on comfort and style, so the next generation must shrink the frame and move hardware into a small pod off the glasses, as Meta got right. Nobody refused a Walkman or iPod because of a wire. x.com x.com
Snap is a weak company because of CEO Evan Spiegel's product judgment. Its new Specs AR glasses, shown publicly for the first time, look so unappealing that they may be the first product ever to launch and not sell a single unit. x.com x.com