Charles Schwab and Circle Internet Group both look like good shorts, building on @tailrisked's remark: "literally charles schwab rip." x.comÂ
bubble boi
Semiconductor Market Commentary, Thru Project Mascot
US banks remain a working short as AI agents could trigger faster deposit flight, an "agentic bank run" flagged via Apollo's Torsten Slok. The short covers Citigroup, Bank of America, JPMorgan, Wells Fargo, Morgan Stanley and the financials sector into earnings. x.comÂ
Circle faces a senior management transition without a clear replacement after its CFO resigned abruptly, a risk not worth ignoring. Capital is better kept in the highest-conviction areas, semiconductors and AI infrastructure, though the medium-term view on bitcoin stays bullish and this call could prove wrong. x.comÂ
Circle still benefits from the large stablecoin trend and USDC's utility for businesses and users, so early AI-agent cash recommendations are no reason to turn bearish. Mizuho cut its target to $43 and sees a 10-20% reserve-revenue hit after sampled agents favored insured, higher-yield options over USDC. Few people let agents manage their money, and those who do are not a large share of USDC holders. Agent-only stablecoin payments may be overhyped. x.comÂ
Circle's earnings were the first fintech report this season that disappointed, making the stock one to sell to a greater fool while the market stays bubbly. x.comÂ
Robinhood is likable, but competition in prediction markets is a growing concern as Schwab and Interactive Brokers enter, and its sweep program could become a problem. The chart is also a mess, and Interactive Brokers looks best of the three brokers. x.comÂ
AI agents will make micropayments natural, putting stablecoin rails like Circle at the center of the next leg of the AI trade. Micropayments failed for humans because of decision fatigue, but software can make thousands of tiny payments per API call, millisecond of compute, tool or ad bid. Bank-account dollars can't move at machine speed, so stablecoins move the money, crypto networks clear it and bitcoin is the neutral reserve. After chips, data centers and power, the financial rails come next. … Show more
Circle faces pricing pressure because stablecoin infrastructure has low barriers to entry, which is why it stays an underweight with only small exposure. The risk showed when Circle fell 13% as Stripe, Coinbase and BlackRock backed a rival stablecoin, Open USD. x.com x.comÂ
Circle is unlikely to win corporate treasuries, because companies holding mostly T-bills gain nothing by handing those assets to Circle so it can collect their yield. That answers @drGhostinOO7, who argues corporate treasuries are waiting to be tokenized and Circle can take market share from SWIFT. x.comÂ
Circle is the preferred stablecoin exposure because stablecoins are the natural payment rail for AI agents, a structural driver distinct from trading hype. It also benefits from interest-rate sensitivity and offers attractive asymmetry after its pullback, making it the highest-conviction name in a buy-the-dip crypto basket. Coinbase is de-prioritized on CLARITY Act uncertainty and revenue risk from its USDC custody renegotiation with Circle, while Robinhood is held at lower conviction. x.comÂ
Bitcoin is a better buy than Circle, whose shares trade along with Bitcoin anyway. Circle also carries policy risk, which makes it a stock not worth backing. x.comÂ