Waste Connections is a stock to buy. x.com 

Waste Connections earns local-monopoly economics by dominating secondary and rural markets rather than big cities. Route density, exclusive franchise agreements, strategically located disposal capacity and a BBB+ balance sheet underpin the model. It trades at 28.7x earnings versus 30.2x historically, about a 5% discount, with eight straight years of dividend growth and an 11.4% 10-year EPS CAGR. The 12-month total return estimate is about 25%. x.com 

Waste Management, Republic Services and Waste Connections own a moat money can't buy: permission to run landfills. US landfills fell from 7,924 in 1988 to roughly 1,500 today while garbage grows every year, and local resistance blocks new permits, so scarcity brings pricing power. The big three in the $130 billion North American market don't fight each other; they absorb the $68 billion held by small haulers. Waste Connections wins by targeting exclusive franchise and rural markets. x.com  x.com  … Show more

Waste Management is one of the best defensive compounders in the market. x.com 

Waste Management is arguably the most durable name on the list because trash has to be collected in all economic conditions and cannot be put off. It has pricing power, an immense moat and an insulated industry, with decent growth, and it is becoming stronger than ever while the market pays it little attention. x.com 

Waste Management's premium multiple rests on free cash flow growth, not its roughly 10% EPS growth. WM expects free cash flow to rise about 29% this year to around $3.8 billion, and it trades at 23.9x P/FCF versus 25.5x historically, with a forecast 25% annual total return and a target around $260. Its hard-to-replicate landfills, transfer stations and routes give it pricing power; it expects about $2 billion of buybacks and raised its dividend 14.5%. Multiple compression is the main risk. x.com  … Show more

Waste Management is still not cheap for a slow-growth company and needs to fall roughly another 10%. The shares became overvalued and, despite being only about 12% off their high, are just returning toward fair value, against @Mindset4Money_X's view that the stock is the cheapest it has been in a long time. x.com 

Quality dividend stocks look like a great place to be over the next few years as the crowded tech trade unwinds. Per @PeterBerezinBCA, in the early dotcom bust tech crashed while the rest of the market rose, so the hedge for stocks was other stocks. A quality dividend basket holds old-economy, cash-generative businesses at sane multiples, while the index hides 50% of its weight in names at 10 times sales. That outweighs a general dislike of dividends as inefficient, taxable compounding. x.com  … Show more

Altria, Johnson & Johnson, Waste Management, TJX, Linde, Costco and Quest Diagnostics add defense to a portfolio, scoring highest among S&P 500 stocks on an antifragility screen of low volatility, strong free cash flow, minimal debt and stable earnings. All are also trending up this year, with momentum scores above 75; Altria scores 100 on antifragility and J&J 99. x.com 

Durable quality stocks should earn more with less risk because investors systematically overpay for lottery-like, volatile stocks. Haugen and Baker found that from 1990 to 2011 across 21 developed markets, the least volatile decile returned 8.7% a year while the most volatile lost 8.8%; in the US, 12% versus minus 7%. Goldman Sachs and BCA studies agree. Per Kahneman, people overweight improbable outcomes and underweight near-certain ones, leaving stable quality names underappreciated. x.com  … Show more