The need for more memory evident in every company's earnings report makes the market's negative view of Sandisk hard to understand. Yet splitting a stock above $1,000 is one of the dumbest moves a company can make: it hands market makers the ability to manipulate the shares through options, a risk for Sandisk. x.com  x.com 

Sandisk's earnings growth makes its valuation look unusually low, with guidance showing no slowdown. Revenue rose 378% year over year, and $52.5 GAAP EPS implies a 6.1 annualized P/E, below Micron's. Sandisk's roughly 85% gross margin also compares favorably with SK hynix's apparently sub-50% NAND margin. Next-quarter guidance calls for $12.2 billion-$12.6 billion of revenue and $55-$57 non-GAAP EPS. x.com  x.com  x.com 

Sandisk's datacenter shipments and restrained bit-supply plan strengthen its growth case, without settling contract protection in a downturn. Management attributed roughly 60% of fiscal Q1 revenue growth to volume and 40% to price; datacenter sales rose 61% sequentially to $4.8B, supplying 88% of total growth. It retains mid-to-high-teens bit growth rather than accelerating supply. Consumer sales fell 29%, and the CFO cautioned against carrying Q2's growth rate into fiscal Q3. x.com  x.com 

SanDisk looks quite cheap despite its huge run, because single-digit forward earnings multiples ignore growth of around 100% a year expected over the next two years. A screen for US companies above $10 billion with forward P/Es under 10 and 25%-plus two-year revenue growth yields just seven names, including SanDisk and Micron. Both are cyclical and may not deserve 30–40x forward multiples, but assigning either a single-digit P/E is crazy. x.com  x.com 

SanDisk still looks cheap at 19x forward earnings while growing EPS at triple-digit rates, even after shares fell 50% in a month. x.com 

Sandisk's growth is coming entirely from higher prices, not more bits shipped, which makes it hard to sustain. Revenue grew 97% quarter over quarter as almost every hyperscaler raised capex to cover rising prices. Its roughly 80% gross margin is excessive and customers resent it; as long as demand far exceeds supply it can keep both, but supply eventually catches up and margins will erode. The open questions are how long new fabs take and whether Sandisk or rivals add the supply. x.com  x.com  … Show more

Sandisk's fast-growing data-center revenue strengthens its case among memory names with upside. Data-center revenue rose 61% quarter over quarter; revenue of $11.03B, adjusted EPS of $49.51 and adjusted gross margin of 85.1% all exceeded estimates. For upside among Micron, Sandisk and Kioxia, Micron ranks first, then Sandisk, then Kioxia, until further guidance. x.com  x.com 

SanDisk's data-center flash growth shows AI inference is becoming a larger storage customer. Data-center revenue reached $4.8bn, up 61% in a quarter and over 40% of sales; total revenue of $11bn and EPS of $49.51 beat expectations. Guidance of $12.4bn revenue and $56 EPS suggests feared supply normalization has not yet eroded pricing. Overweight, with a $2,700 target. x.com  x.com 

Sandisk is a tulip bubble on steroids, and such extremes end in losses of 97% or more. Its monthly RSI reached 99.5, and at the roughly $2,350 peak the price stood about 90% above its monthly 50-period moving average. The unwind is in line with the uninverting of the 10-year/3-month yield curve, and @StockSavvyShay notes Sandisk is in its biggest drawdown of the past year. x.com 

Sandisk is cheap, trading at a forward GAAP price-to-earnings ratio of 6.8, despite @JohnTinsmanAOT's criticism that it is expanding production in Japan while Micron commits to building memory in America. x.com