Lululemon is a classic value trap: EPS guidance fell by a third, so a lower share price is no cheaper, and with EPS likely flat or down for 2-3 years it may need to test the low $80s. Dozens of influencer-led apparel brands selling through Shopify, plus Alo, Vuori and GymShark, offer better products at lower prices without its costly store base. Its mediocre products at premium prices cannot win that fight, and a quick turnaround is unlikely. x.com  x.com  x.com  x.com  x.com 

Lululemon, Nike, Under Armour and On look like cursed value traps because rising competition and unpredictable fashion trends keep eroding their positions. Lululemon has lost its niche dominance as the luxury standard and is now one of a dozen rivals, such as Vuori, Alo and Athleta, chasing the same buyers. Lululemon sits at six-year lows, Nike at 12-year lows, Under Armour at all-time lows and On back at 2022 levels. The products may still be good, but competition is overwhelming. x.com  x.com  … Show more

Lululemon is an 800lb gorilla worth defending despite bad management and the politics around its skin-tight leggings. x.com 

Lululemon no longer looks worth owning after guiding both revenue and earnings down. Consumer discretionary is dead, and AI is holding up the entire economy, though for how long is unclear. Long-dated Treasuries are the better trade now, even as @epictrades1 quotes Michael Burry saying Lululemon is his largest position and he would buy more under $100. x.com  x.com 

Lululemon is probably going lower because sales and margins are imploding while inventory grows, and a new unproven CEO is coming in. Q3 guidance calls for revenue down 10-11%, North America down mid-teens and inventory up low single digits; full-year revenue should fall 5-7% with inventory up mid single digits. Even granting $6 of annualized EPS versus a ~$4 run rate, 12x for an off-trend retailer implies about $70, versus $100 after an 18% drop. x.com  x.com 

Lululemon is cheap at around 11x earnings with gross margins above 50%, while many people, including the founder, are pushing for a turnaround. Sales growth is tiny, but the balance sheet is solid and the company makes an interesting acquisition target. The reported collapse of talks with founder Chip Wilson, per WSJ via @DeItaone, looks good for the stock: Wilson may try to take it private or bring in a strategic buyer. x.com  x.com 

Lululemon is not that tempting even after falling from $500 to about $100, because cheap does not mean buy. At about 1x sales the market prices in roughly zero growth, and analysts expect about $13 of EPS by 2029; at an 8x P/E that is only about $104. Agreeing with @HKIStrategies that the stock may simply move sideways for years, that would still mean losing money to inflation. x.com  x.com 

Lululemon's demand keeps deteriorating, and takeover hopes are a risky reason to hold it. It cut full-year guidance again, with Q2 revenue down 4%, Americas sales down 8% and comparable sales down 9%, sending shares below $100 for the first time since 2019. Michael Burry calls it his largest position and sees a possible private equity takeover, but a Stage 4 decline can last longer than expected, as PayPal holders learned when Stripe chose not to bid. x.com  x.com 

Lululemon's 18% premarket drop looks like an overreaction given its improving margins. x.com 

Lululemon's guidance is the problem: the stock is dumping after mixed results that included a strong EPS beat. The chart had already signaled not to buy yet. x.com  x.com