Dutch Bros is not a bad place to start a position now. x.com 

Dutch Bros now looks like a better and safer bet than chip stocks. x.com 

Dutch Bros faces intensifying competition in a coffee market with low barriers to entry, and its valuation is hard to digest even at current levels. 7 Brew, a deep-pocketed, PE-backed copycat, is expanding aggressively, and regional chains such as Summermoon, Foxtail and Lala Land are scaling across the country. Its efficient model and cult service culture leave some potential, but GLP-1 drugs and affordability and gas-price pressures add overhangs. x.com 

Starbucks looks expensive on an estimate-based earnings screen: 29x next year's projected earnings versus 18x for restaurant chains implies a $49.43-$62.91 fair range against $91.43. That forecast is 80% above trailing earnings; this is levels-only work based on reported estimates, not fundamental diligence. x.com 

Starbucks looks too expensive for its growth. Even after sales of $9.532B and EPS of $0.50 beat estimates, investors are paying about 80x earnings or 42x forward earnings for only 2-5% growth. x.com 

Dutch Bros' business is working and the stock has broken its year-long downtrend. Q1 beat, FY26 revenue guidance was raised to $2.05-2.08bn, and new Planet Dutch drinks plus softer input costs are boosting margins; Freedom Capital and DA Davidson raised targets to $95 and $90. The stock is basing in a tight bull flag; holding $62.17 support should resolve it higher toward $74.02, $77.88 and $86.42, while losing it sends it back into the range. x.com 

Starbucks still carries a premium valuation even as coffee competition intensifies nationwide, so betting against it is reasonable. Coffee is habitual and generates good cash returns, but barriers to entry are low: deep-pocketed, PE-backed 7 Brew and regional chains like Summermoon and Foxtail are scaling aggressively. @CreditCapi's short case adds that store closures inflated Starbucks' same-store sales growth by 483 bps and that competitor openings cut its traffic 8-10%. x.com 

Cava Group trades at the EV/sales multiple where Chipotle peaked, despite vastly inferior unit economics. The persistent bid under the stock is ridiculous. A post the author replies to notes Chipotle's permabid lasted six years, about as far as the fast-casual concept can run before gravity resumes. x.com  x.com 

CAVA looks attractive near $50, close to its 52-week low, with sales projected to grow more than 20% a year for the next three years. It is still an expensive stock at a P/E above 90. x.com 

Cava Group's valuation is hard to justify for a restaurant chain at 74x 2028 earnings, a multiple even Chipotle never reached during its hypergrowth phase. That holds even though, as @Brian_Stoffel_ notes, Cava's same-store sales rose about 10%, well ahead of its closest competition, with traffic up about 7%. x.com