Nike looks overvalued at about 25.6x forward earnings for a business guiding to high-single-digit revenue declines. At $32 on $1.25 of EPS, per the lowered guidance @TrendSpider reports, plus a 5% dividend, tobacco stocks like Altria should triple if that is the going rate for shrinking sales. Nike does not merit a tobacco multiple: it angered its distributors, faces more premium rivals and new entrants, has less loyal customers, is no government-mandated duopoly and pays for costly marketing. … Show more

Nike's 29x P/E even after a steep share-price decline leaves it expensive enough to short. x.com 

Nike's brand concerns look priced in; stabilization, not sudden revenue acceleration, is what the speculative long needs. A few good campaigns and a return to large stores could help, though China consumers will be a drag. Short-term EPS is a poor indicator, and customers may return after trying other brands. x.com  x.com 

Rising gasoline prices are short-term bearish for Lululemon, e.l.f. Beauty, Celsius, Nike, Ulta Beauty, Target and Deckers. Consumers squeezed at the pump spend less on discretionary items, while businesses face higher freight and logistics costs that pressure margins. Long term, the weakness should offer a chance to accumulate great brands at cheaper prices. x.com 

Nike is a stagnant company losing pricing power, pointing to more tough years for shareholders. Revenue fell 4% last quarter, the only line still shrinking while gross margin expanded, inventory fell 3% and North America grew 2%, per the quoted post. x.com 

Cash generation and market values have diverged for these twelve beaten-down stocks. Over the long term, valuations tend to follow the cash businesses produce; the charts compare quarterly free cash flow with market capitalization for Uber, Netflix, Intuit, Adobe, PayPal, McDonald's, Snap, Duolingo, Chewy, Pinterest, Reddit and e.l.f. Beauty. x.com  x.com  x.com  x.com  x.com  x.com  x.com  x.com  x.com  x.com  x.com  x.com 

Nike does not merit a high-teens earnings multiple. Wingstop, CRH and Boston Scientific are much better fallen names right now: after big de-ratings they still trade cheaper than Nike while offering real growth and less long-term risk. x.com 

Nike's latest report confirms a structural unwinding, not a temporary dip, despite the EPS beat. The $0.48 versus $0.44 beat came from expense cuts, a lower tax rate and a lowered bar, while revenue missed and management warned of a high-single-digit full-year sales decline. NIKE Direct fell 8%, digital 13% and owned stores 5%, Greater China plunged 22%, and consumers are fleeing to On, Hoka and Adidas. Cost cuts can't restore cultural heat, and earnings power looks halved. x.com 

Nike's dividend yield, now high versus its ten-year history, is the new question for investors and makes the stock very interesting at these levels. The numbers have not bottomed, guidance was atrocious and parts of the business are getting worse, offset somewhat by better US wholesale. The guidance implies Nike will use some cash to fund the dividend, but it has plenty. The stock remains too expensive on earnings and too cheap on dividend yield. x.com  x.com  x.com  x.com  x.com 

Nike's decline is driven by consumers seeking higher-quality clothing while it clings to profitable polyester-based products. Its refusal to adapt has allowed many competitors to succeed; Nike's demise is underway, and its stock continues to plummet. x.com