LongGameEquity
Long-Term Investor, AI & Software
Rising gasoline prices are short-term bearish for Lululemon, e.l.f. Beauty, Celsius, Nike, Ulta Beauty, Target and Deckers. Consumers squeezed at the pump spend less on discretionary items, while businesses face higher freight and logistics costs that pressure margins. Long term, the weakness should offer a chance to accumulate great brands at cheaper prices. x.comÂ
Lululemon is not worth bottom-fishing even though the bad news will eventually be priced in, because forward estimates keep falling and a bottom is hard to time before fundamentals bottom. The business is not a zero: its stores are still busy, if less than before. There are better places to look for a bargain. x.com x.com x.comÂ
Lululemon risks following Nike's path of margin collapse from peak valuation. Lululemon peaked at 14x EV/sales and 82x forward earnings in 2020, while Nike's EBITDA margin has collapsed from 18% in 2021 to 10.7% today. x.comÂ
Nike's brand concerns look priced in; stabilization, not sudden revenue acceleration, is what the speculative long needs. A few good campaigns and a return to large stores could help, though China consumers will be a drag. Short-term EPS is a poor indicator, and customers may return after trying other brands. x.com x.comÂ
Lululemon's weakness is structural, and consumers may also be tightening budgets for aspirational purchases across apparel. The same slowing-sales trend showed up at other brands this quarter, and heavy wholesale promotions were flagged on the On and Amer Sports calls, making apparel a tough industry to invest in. x.comÂ
Lululemon's problem is its pricing, not a weak consumer. Shoppers are fine but aren't buying its products because the prices no longer make sense, which spells trouble for its margins. x.comÂ
Lululemon offers better risk/reward than Nike if it is not broken, trading below 5x EV/EBITDA versus Nike's 14x. Nike's turnaround through wholesale is very hard for a $50B revenue business facing strong rival brands, less product control, price competition and channel conflict across multiple product lines. Nike may have a better near-term chance of beating estimates and is a more evergreen brand, but Lululemon looks increasingly preferable. x.com x.comÂ
Debt-laden consumer companies without pricing power are ones to avoid because their costs are surging and their customers are tapped out. Nike, McDonald's and Delta are already getting hammered. Constellation Brands should drop below $100 before its next report. x.comÂ
Lululemon is probably going lower because sales and margins are imploding while inventory grows, and a new unproven CEO is coming in. Q3 guidance calls for revenue down 10-11%, North America down mid-teens and inventory up low single digits; full-year revenue should fall 5-7% with inventory up mid single digits. Even granting $6 of annualized EPS versus a ~$4 run rate, 12x for an off-trend retailer implies about $70, versus $100 after an 18% drop. x.com x.comÂ
Lululemon's 18% premarket drop looks like an overreaction given its improving margins. x.comÂ
Lululemon, Nike, Under Armour and On look like cursed value traps because rising competition and unpredictable fashion trends keep eroding their positions. Lululemon has lost its niche dominance as the luxury standard and is now one of a dozen rivals, such as Vuori, Alo and Athleta, chasing the same buyers. Lululemon sits at six-year lows, Nike at 12-year lows, Under Armour at all-time lows and On back at 2022 levels. The products may still be good, but competition is overwhelming. x.com x.com … Show more
