Rising S&P earnings revisions and a Nasdaq valuation far below the 2000 bubble level argue against a bull trap in US large caps. Nasdaq trades at 18x forward earnings versus over 80x in 2000. Positive breadth divergences, record short ETF exposure and put volume, and semiconductors waking up add to the case. In all 19 post-midterm instances cited, markets were very green over the following 12 months. x.com  x.com 

The Nasdaq-100 looks like a good buy here. x.com 

The Nasdaq 100 faces short-term downside because a failed push to a new high leaves crowded bullish sentiment vulnerable to a break below. Despite record institutional accumulation and a long-term bullish position, five months of chop, a failed ATH and an attempted loss of the bullish trend favor hedging rather than adding leverage. x.com  x.com 

The Nasdaq's earnings growth makes its valuation look ridiculously cheap for its quality and diversification. At 23x forward earnings, EPS grew 48% over the past year and net margins are 20%; the attached chart puts ROE at 35%. Extending 18% five-year EPS growth three years implies 14x earnings then with little debt and 30% ROIC; slower growth would still imply about 15x. Beating it requires extreme concentration, a mandate most active managers cannot get from LPs. Index figures per Claude. … Show more

Bubbles rarely end when expected and tend to run much further, so the Nasdaq looks to be in a shakeout rather than at the end of its advance. Nasdaq at 40,000 or 50,000 is not out of the question in a melt-up; those who buy this dip will be greatly rewarded if positioned correctly. x.com  x.com 

Forward risks matter more than good earnings for the Nasdaq now. The index looks to be topping and has a good shot at 28,000 before a rally after the midterms; tomorrow's PCE and GDP releases are unlikely to help, and this week's lows could break. x.com  x.com 

S&P 500 earnings are keeping pace with prices, so this does not look like a bubble. Quarterly earnings are on track to grow 29.5%, more than twice the 10-year average of 12.6%, while the 18.7 forward P/E is just below its 19.1 decade average. x.com 

Strong corporate profit margins may make the S&P 500 better value than traditional P/E ratios suggest, despite elevated stock prices. Per Bloomberg, its P/E-to-profitability ratio is at its lowest in nearly 14 years, last seen around 2012. Wall Street might be overlooking something important. x.com 

Accumulating macro headwinds have sharply raised Nasdaq 100 risk, so protect the portfolio. The bull market looks near its end rather than its beginning, although the timing of the top remains uncertain. x.com 

The AI supercycle is backed by real profit growth, not a bubble. Nasdaq-100 earnings-per-share growth just crossed 50%, faster than the post-GFC rebound and every expansion cycle of the last two decades, with revenue growth rising alongside it. Bubbles are built on multiple expansion and nonexistent earnings; this is an acceleration in real cash flow. x.com